According to the analytical perspective provided, what factor might make a GEO satellite statistically *more* susceptible to a mission-ending natural strike than an LEO satellite?
Answer
GEO satellites are less shielded by Earth's mass or magnetic field than LEO objects are to some degree.
The text suggests that because GEO satellites orbit higher, they are less shielded by the Earth's mass compared to LEO objects, potentially exposing them more to higher-energy natural micrometeoroids traveling across the ecliptic plane.
#Videos
Stunning New Videos From NASA's Asteroid Impacting ... - YouTube
Nasa Dart spacecraft successfully smashes into asteroid - BBC News
Related Questions
What is the designation for a small rocky or metallic body traveling in outer space?What specific operational hazard is posed by microscopic dust grains hitting satellites at orbital velocities?In crowded orbits like LEO, what source is cited as presenting a significantly higher density threat than natural meteoroids?Which two objects collided in the devastating 2009 event, which served as a classic example of man-made orbital threats?What is the primary purpose of engineering features like Whipple shields on critical spacecraft components?What is the definition for an object that survives its fiery passage through the atmosphere and lands on Earth's surface?Why is assigning a definitive 'meteor strike' cause to damaged, un-tracked small satellites exceptionally difficult?What was the objective of NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission?According to the analytical perspective provided, what factor might make a GEO satellite statistically *more* susceptible to a mission-ending natural strike than an LEO satellite?When operational safety procedures are developed, which threat source are collision avoidance systems primarily programmed to react to?What happened to the two objects involved in the 2009 collision after impact?