Why are Collision Avoidance Maneuvers (CAMs) rarely executed for natural objects?
Answer
The cost, time, and fuel expenditure do not justify the action for a statistically tiny chance of impact
Due to the sheer number of natural meteoroids, tracking them all for avoidance is impractical, and the fuel expenditure required for a statistically tiny chance of impact does not justify the action.
#Videos
How To Recognize Space Rocks vs Satellites - YouTube
Related Questions
Which type of object is described as the more insidious enemy dominating the constant bombardment faced by spacecraft?What combination of factors explains why catastrophic random meteoroid strikes are not frequently observed?Which orbital region is noted for having a much higher concentration of junk compared to higher orbits?At what approximate speed can objects sometimes reach in LEO?What definition is given for a 'meteor' based on the text?What is the primary difference between natural micrometeoroids and human-made orbital debris (OD)?On what basis do space surveillance networks typically prioritize tracking potential high-risk encounters?Why do satellites rely heavily on passive protection systems like the Whipple shield?What is the specific role of the thin outer bumper in a Whipple shield upon impact?Why are Collision Avoidance Maneuvers (CAMs) rarely executed for natural objects?