Which earlier mission concept, involving a modified Dragon 2 capsule, was shelved in favor of the Starship vehicle?
Answer
Red Dragon missions
Before the full commitment to the massive Starship system, there was an earlier iteration of plans focusing on Mars delivery. This concept involved utilizing a modified version of the existing Dragon 2 capsule, referred to as the Red Dragon missions. The goal envisioned for this scaled-down approach was sending cargo or potentially preliminary elements to Mars by the mid-2020s. However, this plan was ultimately abandoned or shelved as the overall aspiration shifted towards creating a fully reusable system capable of supporting a self-sufficient Martian city, requiring the much larger capacity and capability inherent in the Starship vehicle architecture.

#Videos
Elon Musk revealed Unexpected Starship Timeline to Mars in 2026 ...
Related Questions
How many tanker launches are required to top off a single Starship for Mars transit, based on propellant calculations by Donald Rapp?What astronomical constraint forces SpaceX to adopt a "massively compressed waterfall" approach for deep space elements like Mars missions?How massive is the Starship vehicle upon arrival at Mars compared to any previous Martian lander?Which earlier mission concept, involving a modified Dragon 2 capsule, was shelved in favor of the Starship vehicle?What alternative surface preparation methods do some experts suggest instead of relying solely on Optimus humanoid robots?What stability concern does Scott Hubbard raise regarding Starship's tall, slender vehicle profile during vertical propulsive landing?How long is the overarching goal of establishing a self-sustaining Martian city projected to take after the first crewed missions?What date did Elon Musk suggest for a crewed mission taking place no earlier than, even with the earlier 2026 uncrewed goal?How many uncrewed Starships were announced for launch during the 2026 window to test reliable landing?What specific reusable material does Starship utilize for its aerobraking heat shield, contrasting previous NASA reliance on ablative shields?