What is the core difference between NASA's historical management model and the subsequent commercial approach?
Answer
Historically, NASA managed design and operation, whereas the commercial approach involves defining the goal and contracting a partner to develop the means.
The commercial approach flips the dynamic by having NASA define the required outcome, such as safe transport, and contracting a commercial partner to develop the necessary hardware and operations under a defined budget structure.
#Videos
How The U.S. Became So Dependent On SpaceX - YouTube
Related Questions
Why did NASA pivot strategically to rely heavily on private entities for access to orbit?What is the core difference between NASA's historical management model and the subsequent commercial approach?How does the commercial contracting model affect the distribution of financial risk compared to prior government programs?What fundamental aspect of SpaceX's hardware has most significantly reshaped the economics of accessing space?What analogy is used to simplify the change in NASA's purchasing strategy for transportation?Besides cost savings, what factor is crucial in cementing NASA's reliance on SpaceX for critical missions?How did SpaceX compare to Boeing during the early development phases of the Commercial Crew Program vehicles?What primary risk arises from placing the main capability for human spaceflight access in one commercial operator?What was the fundamental rationale behind NASA's original Commercial Crew Program goal of contracting two independent providers?What does NASA need to cultivate internally to manage the shift toward reliance on private sector advancements like Starship?