What did the discovery of Super-Earths, a common class absent in our Solar System, suggest about planetary architecture?
Answer
That the structure seen in our Solar System might be the exception, not the rule.
Finding a very common class of planets, Super-Earths, that has no local analog implied that the orderly structure of our own system might be unusual rather than the universal standard.
Related Questions
What was the most stunning revelation accompanying the first confirmed exoplanet detections?Why were early detection methods most sensitive to large planets orbiting closely?According to early models based on the Solar System, where was the required location for large, gaseous giants to form?What was the defining orbital characteristic of the newly discovered 'Hot Jupiters'?What major implication did the existence of Hot Jupiters have for the core accretion theory as it was understood then?What necessity led to the birth of 'planetary migration' as a mainstream astrophysics theory?Which mechanism is proposed for planetary migration involving gravitational friction?What did the discovery of Super-Earths, a common class absent in our Solar System, suggest about planetary architecture?What do highly eccentric orbits observed in exoplanetary systems suggest about their evolution?What is the broad implication of planetary migration being a common process?What is the current general estimate regarding the abundance of planets in the Milky Way galaxy?