What was the core flaw in the Soviet program regarding design commitment compared to Apollo?
Answer
The leadership never authorized a single, definitive N1/Lunar Lander configuration
Unlike the unwavering commitment the US Congress gave Apollo, the Soviet leadership failed to authorize a single, definitive N1/Lunar Lander configuration with the same multi-year certainty, leading to design paralysis.
#Videos
Why Russia Did Not Put a Man on the Moon - YouTube
Related Questions
What was the designated Soviet lunar launch vehicle that failed all four of its test launches?How many engines did the first stage of the Soviet N1 rocket use?Who was the Chief Designer of the early Soviet space successes whose death in 1966 severely hampered the lunar program?What happened during the four test launches of the N1 rocket between 1969 and 1972?What was the primary technical vulnerability stemming from the N1's engine design compared to the Saturn V?Which American figure maintained relatively unhindered authority over the successful Saturn V development?What specific explosion in July 1969 was a particularly devastating failure for the Soviet lunar effort?Following the loss of the symbolic race in 1969, what did Moscow strategically redirect its technical expertise towards?What was the core flaw in the Soviet program regarding design commitment compared to Apollo?How did the highly secretive nature of the Soviet space program ultimately hinder its ability to correct technical setbacks?