During developmental Starship tests, from where could the termination command originate, provided it met regulatory standards?
Answer
SpaceX personnel on the ground, adhering to pre-approved parameters established with regulatory bodies
For Starship developmental flights, termination commands could originate from SpaceX personnel on the ground, provided they acted within the confines of parameters pre-approved by regulatory bodies such as the FAA.
#Videos
SpaceX Starship self-destructs after successful launch and test flight
Related Questions
What is the real-world term for the concept of a rocket's self-destruct mechanism?What is the primary regulatory motivation behind requiring launch providers to implement an FTS?Under what condition is the Falcon 9's FTS primarily designed to activate automatically during an operational flight?Why is rapid, automated activation of the Falcon 9 FTS vital shortly after liftoff?What characterized the initial phases of Starship's integrated flight tests (IFTs) that influenced FTS requirements?What contrast exists regarding the intent of the FTS between an uncrewed Falcon 9 mission and an uncrewed Starship developmental test?How is the physical destruction of the rocket typically engineered to occur via the FTS mechanism?What safety feature is the primary method for saving the crew aboard the Crew Dragon capsule during a booster malfunction?How does the authorization criteria for using the FTS change significantly when dealing with a crewed flight compared to an uncrewed flight?During developmental Starship tests, from where could the termination command originate, provided it met regulatory standards?What is the stated goal of a well-executed FTS injection regarding the rocket's trajectory and debris?What differentiates the Falcon 9's termination system from some older termination systems regarding activation?