Which statement correctly distinguishes a nova from a supernova based on the core object's destiny?
Answer
A nova is non-terminal for the core object, whereas a supernova represents the terminal death of a star
The primary difference between a nova and a supernova lies in their consequence for the stellar remnant. A nova is characterized by a surface explosion on a white dwarf, which survives the event and remains available to repeat the outburst later, making it non-terminal for the core. Conversely, a supernova is defined as the catastrophic, final life stage of a massive star, resulting in the complete destruction of the star or its collapse into a compact object like a neutron star or black hole. The term 'supernova' inherently signifies totality and finality.
Related Questions
What is a very direct, though less frequently used, substitute for the term supernova?What is the stellar fate of the white dwarf star following a nova event?How does the typical energy released in a supernova compare to that of a nova event?Which descriptive phrase accurately points to the mechanism behind Type II supernovae?What does the term supernova literally imply regarding a regular nova?What specific process on a white dwarf triggers the transient astronomical event known as a nova?Why does supernova maintain dominance over descriptive synonyms in scientific literature?Which statement correctly distinguishes a nova from a supernova based on the core object's destiny?What descriptive term might appear in less formal writing to emphasize the sudden appearance and immense light output of a supernova?What crucial cosmic process is intrinsically linked to the context of the supernova event regarding material genesis?