What condition allows designers to deliberately omit propulsion systems, opting for passive orbits?
Answer
If the satellite is designed for a fixed, finite operational window where natural decay is acceptable
Propulsion systems add mass, complexity, and cost. Designers omit them when maximizing satellite count and payload mass is prioritized over maximizing operational lifetime via fuel reserves.
#Videos
Satellites That Scoop Air And Use It As Propellant - YouTube
Related Questions
What is the primary force causing most near-Earth satellites to require propulsion systems?If atmospheric drag on a LEO satellite is left uncorrected, what is the eventual outcome?What is the most critical application of propulsion for satellites operating in Geostationary Orbit (GEO)?What causes longitudinal drift and inclination changes for satellites in Geostationary Orbit?What type of maneuver requires significant velocity adjustments, or Delta-V, provided by onboard thrusters?When comparing chemical and electric propulsion systems, what specific measurement defines the trade-off between thrust magnitude and propellant efficiency?How do chemical propulsion systems generate thrust?What advantage do Ion Thrusters offer over chemical systems for long-duration missions?What condition allows designers to deliberately omit propulsion systems, opting for passive orbits?What mechanism is cited as an emerging concept for next-generation satellites to maneuver or maintain altitude without conventional propellant tanks?How do electrodynamic tethers generate directional force without expending stored propellant mass?Which type of chemical system is generally simpler and often used for smaller maneuvering or attitude control thrusters?