If one used the Sun's mass as the average mass for all stars when calculating the star count, what would be the result?
Answer
The star count would be vastly overestimated.
Since the majority of stars are low-mass stars, using the Sun's mass ($1$ solar mass) as the average results in an overestimate because the true mean stellar mass is considerably lower.
Related Questions
What is the typical estimated range for the number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy?What is the fundamental first step astronomers take to estimate the total number of stars in a galaxy?How do scientists estimate the total mass of the Milky Way galaxy?What complicates the calculation derived immediately after determining the Milky Way's total mass from gravitational observations?What is the most common type of star found in the Milky Way's stellar population?What mathematical model do astronomers use to predict the distribution of stellar masses?If one used the Sun's mass as the average mass for all stars when calculating the star count, what would be the result?What is the primary technique used for counting stars in specific, localized regions like dense stellar groupings?What major factor prevents the simple application of star sampling methods consistently across the entire galaxy?How do astronomers estimate the total number of galaxies in the observable universe?What astronomical order of magnitude is frequently cited for the total number of stars in the universe?If scientists overestimate the average stellar mass by 25% in a galaxy, how does this error propagate to the final star count estimate?