According to the text, why is the far side proving to be a better natural laboratory for early solar system chemistry than previously thought?
Answer
It has been less geologically modified by the processes that reshaped the near side
The far side is proving to be a better natural laboratory because its relative lack of geological modification, especially compared to the resurfaced near side, allows for better retention of early solar system chemical memory.
#Videos
What China Found on The Moon - YouTube
Related Questions
What geological feature primarily dominates the near side of the Moon, contrasting with the far side?What specific type of primitive space rock material was identified embedded in the Moon’s far side surface material?Why are CI chondrites considered particularly valuable materials by planetary scientists?How did the near side's geological activity affect the visibility of the Moon's early impact record?What specific characteristic was detected about the subsurface near the Chang'e 4 lander in the Von Kármán crater?What potential engineering challenge arises from the discovery of higher than anticipated geothermal gradients on the far side?What feature on the far side appears much older and less modified by resurfacing events compared to the near side?What possibility is raised by finding primitive, potentially hydrated CI chondrite dust preserved on the far side terrain?What primary implication does the far side heat flux data suggest regarding the Moon's interior?Which mission targeted the Oceanus Procellarum region on the near side for sample return?According to the text, why is the far side proving to be a better natural laboratory for early solar system chemistry than previously thought?