What primary user benefit does the five-year, lower-altitude design choice prioritize over longevity?
Answer
Lower latency
The decision to aim for a five-year, lower-altitude lifespan is an engineering tradeoff favoring lower latency and easier deorbiting over longevity.
Related Questions
What is the current operational goal or planned lifespan for a Starlink satellite before intentional retirement?What is the typical operational altitude cited for Starlink satellites in Low-Earth Orbit (LEO)?Below what approximate altitude must a Starlink satellite descend to ensure it burns up completely upon re-entry?As of late 2023, approximately how many Starlink satellites had SpaceX successfully deorbited after completing their service?What phenomenon, caused by the solar cycle peaking roughly every 11 years, significantly increases atmospheric drag on LEO satellites?Due to a severe geomagnetic storm in February 2022, what percentage of satellites deployed on that single launch were lost?If SpaceX achieves its planned constellation size of 42,000 satellites, how many replacements must be launched annually just to maintain a steady state based on the five-year target?What specific substance is released into the upper atmosphere when thousands of Starlink satellites burn up during re-entry annually?What primary user benefit does the five-year, lower-altitude design choice prioritize over longevity?What is the average success rate per mission for Starlink launches regarding satellites becoming operational?