What management concept was highlighted by the recurring issue preceding the Columbia loss?
Answer
Normalization of deviance.
The investigation into the Columbia disaster pointed toward the concept of normalization of deviance as a contributing systemic vulnerability. This occurred because the specific issue—foam insulation separating from the external tank and striking the wing—had happened on nearly every preceding flight without causing catastrophe. Over time, this known, small deviation from ideal engineering performance became an accepted operational practice rather than a risk warranting mandatory mission scrubs or redesigns until the failure became catastrophic during STS-107.

#Videos
NASA observes anniversary of Challenger shuttle explosion
What Caused the Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion? - YouTube
Related Questions
What technical anomaly caused the Space Shuttle Challenger structural breakup?During which mission phase did the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrate?How long after liftoff did the Space Shuttle Challenger break up?What struck the Space Shuttle Columbia's left wing leading edge shortly after launch?From which specific location did the Space Shuttle Challenger (STS-51L) launch?What is the time difference between the Challenger loss and the Columbia disaster?What management concept was highlighted by the recurring issue preceding the Columbia loss?What common characteristic linked the critical failures in both Challenger and Columbia incidents?What resulted directly from the loss of seal integrity in the Challenger's SRB?Which disaster stands as the most recent major in-flight catastrophic breakup detailed?