According to the text, what is NASA generally built for, versus ISRO?
Answer
NASA is built for scale and long-term presence; ISRO is perfected for maximum impact on a restricted budget
An observer might conclude that NASA is built for scale and long-term presence, while ISRO is perfected for maximum impact on a restricted budget.
#Videos
ISRO vs NASA | The History and Future of Space Race | Dhruv Rathee
ISRO's Thrifty Mission Compared to NASA's Billion-Dollar Venture
Here's How ISRO Compares With NASA - YouTube
Related Questions
By what measure does NASA's annual budget compare to ISRO's?What is ISRO's most frequently cited strength when compared globally?Which characteristic defines NASA's operational approach enabled by its funding?What specific success cemented ISRO's image regarding lunar exploration?Which factor dictates the scope and risk tolerance of ISRO's projects?Which historical NASA program is cited as evidence of its deep experience in human spaceflight?What defines ISRO's technological maturity when measured by constrained execution?What is a primary focus area of ISRO's mission portfolio for national development?According to the text, what is NASA generally built for, versus ISRO?What aspect of space exploration requires technological hurdles that ISRO is only beginning to tackle?What is generally secondary to the engineering standard in NASA's mandate?