How do the geometric considerations ($B imes N$) of an infinite, static universe resolve the paradox mathematically?
Answer
The number of stars increases proportionally with the volume ($N imes d^3$), perfectly counteracting the dimming effect of distance ($B imes 1/d^2$).
In a hypothetical infinite and static universe, while the apparent brightness ($B$) of an individual source dims according to the inverse-square law ($B imes 1/d^2$), the volume containing those sources increases with the cube of the distance ($V imes d^3$), meaning the number of stars ($N$) increases proportionally to $d^3$. Mathematically, these two effects cancel each other out, predicting that the sky brightness remains constant regardless of distance, leading directly to the paradox that the sky should blaze brightly.

#Videos
Why is the Night Sky Dark? | Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains...
Related Questions
What is Olbers' Paradox regarding the night sky's appearance?Who is the German astronomer after whom Olbers' Paradox is named?Why was the early proposal involving interstellar dust failing to solve Olbers' Paradox?What modern cosmological feature is the most crucial element in resolving Olbers' Paradox?What boundary is defined by the maximum distance light could travel in 13.8 billion years?What causes the wavelength of light to increase as it travels from distant objects?How does cosmological redshift affect light from the most ancient and distant sources?What is the invisible ancient glow resulting from redshifted, highly stretched ancient light called?How do the geometric considerations ($B imes N$) of an infinite, static universe resolve the paradox mathematically?What realization does the dark night sky provide as strong evidence for?