According to the feature comparison table, what stage recovery method is the target for the Next-Generation Goal?
Answer
Vertical Landing
The comparison table provided clearly delineates the shift in approach between the Legacy System context and the Next-Generation Goal. While the legacy system (like Soyuz) operated under a fully expendable model with no stage recovery planned, the targeted capability for future hardware explicitly lists vertical landing as the desired mechanism for achieving reusability. Vertical landing implies a controlled, powered descent back to a landing pad, which is the standard benchmark for achieving rapid turnaround and minimizing component loss in modern reusable launch vehicle architectures.
#Videos
Russia's “Korona” Rocket: The SpaceX Challenger You Haven't ...
Related Questions
What characteristic defines the venerable Soyuz rocket family inherited from Soviet-era designs?What specific propellant combination is reportedly powering Russia's next-generation reusable rocket hardware?What primary benefit does burning methane offer over traditional kerosene (RP-1) for engine reuse?What crucial operational goal is directly supported by methane's cleaner burn characteristics?Against which nation or competitor is there a strong external perception that the Russian reusable effort lags, particularly in booster recovery?What describes the historical Russian method of vehicle maturation contrasting with the current leader in reusability?What fundamental engineering challenge does the development of reusable rockets represent for Russia, requiring excellence across multiple disciplines?According to the feature comparison table, what stage recovery method is the target for the Next-Generation Goal?Where have reports noted the involvement of Russian engineers and computing specialists in advanced launch vehicle assembly?What specific area of engineering expertise is still present and engaged internationally, crucial for tackling challenges like precision landing systems?