What major discrepancy exists between the astronomical size of constellations and astrological signs?
Answer
The actual angular length of constellations varies widely (e.g., Virgo $\approx 45 ext{ extdegree}$ vs. Scorpio $\approx 16 ext{ extdegree}$), unlike the fixed $30 ext{ extdegree}$ astrological segments.
The astronomical reality is that the actual angular lengths of constellations along the ecliptic vary significantly; for instance, Virgo can span nearly $45$ degrees while Scorpio may cover only $16$ degrees, contrasting sharply with the astrologically fixed $30$-degree divisions.
#Videos
The Ecliptic: Crash Course Kids #37.2 - YouTube
Related Questions
What is the astronomical term for the track the Sun appears to trace across the celestial sphere annually?What do the equinoxes represent in relation to the ecliptic?What determines the severity of the seasons and is currently about $23.4$ degrees?What is the approximate width of the traditional zodiac band surrounding the ecliptic?Which constellation does the Sun pass through astronomically that is usually excluded from the traditional twelve astrological signs?How is the ecliptic divided within the traditional astrological system?What major discrepancy exists between the astronomical size of constellations and astrological signs?What phenomenon causes the zero points for celestial longitude (the equinoxes) to shift westward along the ecliptic over long periods?How does the modern astronomical location of the spring equinox differ from its location when the zodiac system was formalized two millennia ago?How does the Moon's orbital path relate to the ecliptic?