What cultural friction point resists necessary safety changes in a program perceived as successful?
Answer
Resistance to changing processes because "if it hasn't failed, why change it?"
When a program is achieving high-profile successes, there is a natural human tendency to resist suggestions that current processes require revision.
#Videos
The Biggest NASA Lie: The Fatal Flaw That Destroyed a Space Shuttle
Infamous NASA Disasters That Were Worse Than You Realize
Related Questions
What specific component failure was identified as the cause of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster?How long after liftoff did the Space Shuttle Challenger disintegrate during mission STS-51L?What critical finding did the Rogers Commission report regarding the management structure prior to the Challenger accident?During what phase of the Apollo 1 mission did the fatal fire occur?What environmental factor inside the Apollo 1 capsule accelerated the spread of the fire?What was the primary objective of the Genesis mission that was severely hampered by its return failure?What went wrong when the Genesis sample return capsule attempted to land in the Utah desert in 2004?What cultural friction point resists necessary safety changes in a program perceived as successful?What mechanism is cited as an attempt to embed a perpetually questioning mindset within NASA's structure?What is acknowledged as inherently true regarding the failure probability for missions operating at the very edge of current technology?What system is mentioned as a well-known example where anecdotal evidence and technical details about close calls are logged and analyzed?