What common point of confusion does the text highlight regarding stellar size comparisons?
Answer
Being largest by volume does not automatically mean being the most massive star
Many large hypergiants are diffuse, having a large radius but only 20 to 40 times the Sun's mass, whereas smaller, denser stars can be far more massive.
Related Questions
What percentage of the total mass of our solar system is comprised by the Sun?What is the approximate diameter of the Sun used as a yardstick for stellar size comparisons?In terms of size, what characteristic defines the largest stars like red supergiants compared to the Sun?If one of the known large giants were centered in our Solar System, which planet's orbit could it potentially swallow?What calculation must be performed on the diameter ratio to determine how many Suns fit inside a giant star's volume?What is the estimated linear diameter ratio of VY Canis Majoris compared to the Sun?If a star had a diameter 2,000 times that of the Sun, what volume capacity in Suns would result from cubing that factor?What is one suggested volume capacity for a star like UY Scuti in terms of Suns?What common point of confusion does the text highlight regarding stellar size comparisons?How long is the Sun expected to stably fuse hydrogen, and what fraction of that time has passed?