According to the engineering comparison, which planet's surface might be *technically* easier to approach for minimal technology modification?
Answer
Mercury's surface
The text suggests that solving the extreme thermal gradient of Mercury (perhaps by sinking underground) might be an order of magnitude less challenging than building structures to resist the crushing pressure and incineration on Venus's surface.
Related Questions
What is the average surface temperature on Venus, and what common material could it melt?What is the approximate temperature differential between day and night on the surface of Mercury?How does the surface atmospheric pressure on Venus compare to that on Earth?What unique environmental niche exists in the Venusian atmosphere that is considered surprisingly Earth-like?What describes the atmosphere of Mercury?Which factor is cited as the primary reason Venus is the Solar System's hottest planet, despite not being the closest to the Sun?What is the longest rotational period listed for a planet, belonging to Venus?Which terrestrial planet is identified in the text as the smallest?What is the main engineering hurdle for establishing a surface outpost on Venus?According to the engineering comparison, which planet's surface might be *technically* easier to approach for minimal technology modification?