What key advantage does NASA gain by shifting propellant sourcing to commercial vendors like Air Products and Plug Power?
Answer
The responsibility and capital outlay for expanding liquefaction capacity shifts to commercial partners
With these contracts, the responsibility and the capital expenditure required for expanding liquefaction and distribution capacity transfers from NASA to the commercial partners.
#Videos
Plug Power Just Landed NASA — And It Could Change ... - YouTube
Related Questions
What property makes liquid hydrogen the preferred propellant choice for high-performance upper stages?At what specific temperature must hydrogen be cooled to exist as a liquid for storage?Which major NASA launch facility relies heavily on the reliable, massive supply of liquid hydrogen?Which two industrial gas companies were awarded major commercial contracts to supply NASA with liquid hydrogen?When are deliveries of liquid hydrogen from the Air Products contract scheduled to commence?What is Plug Power rapidly expanding its capabilities to focus on for hydrogen production?What is the term for the loss of propellant that occurs due to inefficiencies in cryogenic storage or transport?What key advantage does NASA gain by shifting propellant sourcing to commercial vendors like Air Products and Plug Power?What logistical constraint narrows down the list of viable production sites for both $ ext{LH}_2$ suppliers?What inherent advantage does utilizing two primary vendors, Air Products and Plug Power, offer NASA's supply chain?