What engineering implication arises directly from the low density of $ ext{LH}_2$?
Answer
Fuel tanks must be physically enormous to store sufficient mass.
Due to its low density, storing the necessary mass of $ ext{LH}_2$ requires tanks that are physically much larger than those required for denser fuels, impacting vehicle architecture and cross-section.
Related Questions
What property of liquid hydrogen makes it the performance king among rocket fuels based on mass?Which metric is most crucial in rocketry to quantify propellant efficiency, measured in seconds?What is the approximate highest specific impulse achievable by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen systems in a vacuum?What is the only byproduct when liquid hydrogen burns with liquid oxygen?What is the primary physical drawback that complicates the widespread adoption of liquid hydrogen?What engineering implication arises directly from the low density of $ ext{LH}_2$?What specific challenge does the super-cooling required for $ ext{LH}_2$ introduce over time, especially on long missions?At what temperature must liquid hydrogen be maintained?Why are denser fuels like $ ext{RP-1}$ often favored for the first stages of launch vehicles?Where does the use of $ ext{LH}_2/ ext{LOX}$ provide the greatest advantage in a typical launch vehicle architecture?What standard industrial method for producing hydrogen releases carbon dioxide?