What concept suggests that dividing science into a sharp 'hard' or 'soft' binary is inaccurate?
Answer
The existence of a continuum where disciplines share varying degrees of mathematical dependence and control complexity.
Many modern scientific thinkers caution against the rigid separation of sciences into hard and soft categories. Instead of a sharp division, the structure is better conceptualized as a continuum. On this spectrum, disciplines exist based on a gradient of characteristics, including the extent of mathematical reliance, the degree of experimental control achievable, and the intrinsic complexity of the subject matter being studied. A field's placement shifts based on which of these factors is most dominant in its daily methodology.
Related Questions
What characterizes "hard" sciences like Physics and Chemistry according to methodology?Which physical disciplines form the theoretical underpinnings of Astronomy?Where does Astronomy encounter methodological stumbling blocks associated with 'softer' fields?What influences the placement of a scientific field along the hard/soft spectrum besides epistemological rigor?What concept suggests that dividing science into a sharp 'hard' or 'soft' binary is inaccurate?What is the key difference making modeling a rainforest ecosystem more difficult than modeling a pendulum?What specific quantitative success in observational astronomy supports a claim to 'hardness'?What specific aspect of data acquisition prevents astrophysicists from controlling phenomena like a chemist?What are the disciplines generally considered the bedrock of the 'hard sciences'?Why does the validation loop for observational astronomy differ from a typical terrestrial lab setting?