According to the data recording interpretation, what specific intensity level did the final digit '5' in 6EQUJ5 represent?
Answer
The signal strength was more than 31.9 times the measured background noise
The sequence used to encode the signal strength numerically indicated that the signal was tremendously powerful relative to the typical static recorded by the Big Ear. Specifically, the number '5' at the end of the alphanumeric string corresponded to a power level exceeding 31.9 times the established background noise level. This extremely high ratio between the signal peak and the ambient radio static was a critical factor that immediately alerted Jerry Ehman to its extraordinary nature, setting it apart from routine background measurements.
#Videos
We Were Wrong About the Wow! Signal - It Was Even More Bizarre
Related Questions
What alphanumeric sequence captured Jerry Ehman’s attention on the printouts from the Big Ear telescope?Which university owned and operated the Big Ear radio telescope used for the 1977 observation?How long did the Big Ear telescope's observation window last for the specific patch of sky where the 6EQUJ5 signal was recorded?What is the extremely specific frequency, measured in MHz, where the 6EQUJ5 signal was detected?What characteristic implies the 6EQUJ5 signal was artificial rather than natural noise like a quasar emission?According to the data recording interpretation, what specific intensity level did the final digit '5' in 6EQUJ5 represent?What did Antonio Paris hypothesize was the true source causing the strong, narrowband signal mimicking an alien beacon?What key observation made by Antonio Paris's research strengthened the comet theory regarding the 6EQUJ5 signal?What specific behavior of the asteroid 3200 Phaethon relates it to the potential explanation for the Wow! signal?What is the fundamental challenge in SETI research highlighted by the single, unrepeatable detection of the 6EQUJ5 signal?What did the nonrepeatable nature of the signal lead many scientists to conclude about its origin?