What is the main reason for the debate between METI and passive listening?
Answer
Concerns about existential risk or unforeseen negative consequences.
Apprehension about what aliens might be like leads to debates over active messaging (METI) versus remaining passive, driven by fears of negative consequences from contact.
#Videos
Should we try to communicate with aliens? - BBC - YouTube
Related Questions
What fundamental human drive fuels the fascination with extraterrestrial life?What enduring scientific question would finding life elsewhere resolve?If simple life is found, how does that reframe the concept of biology?What significance would finding alien life based on different information storage molecules hold?What historical evidence mentioned suggests government seriousness about contact?What is the main reason for the debate between METI and passive listening?According to proponents of contact, what is a major potential upside of meeting advanced aliens?Which artifacts were early physical examples of sending messages outward?What is the 'mirror effect' motivation for seeking extraterrestrial contact?What is the subtle distinction often overlooked regarding near-term goals in the search?